The science behind what we say

office

How we create, review, and maintain the health information you trust. Grounded in evidence and clinician-reviewed.

The Foundation

Our commitment to accuracy

Health decisions deserve better than guesswork. Every piece of content on Numan is built on clinical evidence, written with objectivity, and reviewed by qualified medical professionals before it ever reaches you.

Our content follows the principles of clinical evidence, sourcing data from peer-reviewed journals, academic institutions, and government health bodies (e.g., NHS, NICE, MHRA). This isn't a checkbox exercise. It's the foundation of how we operate.

Process

The Numan Clinical Review

Every piece of content follows a five-stage lifecycle.

Sourcing & citation standards

Not all sources are equal. We operate a tiered sourcing framework that prioritises primary research and high-authority medical databases over secondary reporting.

Primary sources

Original peer-reviewed studies, randomised controlled trials, and systematic reviews published in recognised journals.

Institutional guidelines

We reference guidance from NHS, NICE, MHRA, WHO, and equivalent regulatory bodies.

Expert commentary

Authoritative analysis from recognised specialists, used only to contextualise — never as standalone evidence.

Management

Approved databases

PubMed

NIH / NLM Database

The Lancet

Peer-reviewed journal

Cochrane

Systematic reviews

NICE

UK clinical guidelines

NHS

UK health service

MHRA

UK medicines regulator

The medically reviewed badge

When you see this badge at the top of an article, it means a named, qualified clinician has personally vetted the content for medical accuracy.

What this means:

  • The reviewing clinician is a GMC-registered doctor or GPhC-registered pharmacist with relevant clinical experience.

  • Their name and credentials are displayed alongside the badge, linked to their full Expert Profile on Numan.

  • The review date is shown so you always know how recently the content was verified.

Dani Brightman

What we don't use

Anecdotal evidence, unsourced claims, non-peer-reviewed opinion pieces, and content from sources without verifiable credentials. If we can't trace a claim back to robust evidence, we aim not to publish.

Content maintenance & freshness

Medical guidelines evolve. New research emerges. Regulatory positions shift. What was accurate a year ago may no longer reflect best practice, and, for health content, that distinction matters.

Numan performs Annual Clinical Audits on all evergreen content. Every article, treatment page, and clinical guide is reassessed against current UK medical standards, with updates applied where the evidence base has moved.

Woman at home

Transparency

Independence & transparency

Numan is a healthcare company. We sell treatments. That context matters and we don't hide from it. What we do is draw a clear, visible line between clinical education and commercial recommendation.

Editorial independence

Clinical and editorial teams lead on health content. Medical accuracy and editorial direction aren't shaped by commercial priorities.

Clear labelling

Product pages and treatment recommendations are always identifiable. You'll never mistake a commercial page for an educational article.

Built for trust

Our writers and reviewers focus on accuracy, not performance. Their job is to inform, not to sell.

UK DOCTORS AND CLINICIANS

Your expert team

Specialists in medicine, nutrition, performance, and diagnostics.

Man smiling in blue t-shirt against yellow background

Medically reviewed by Hassan Thwaini

Clinical Pharmacist and Copywriter, Master of Pharmacy (MPharm)

Hassan is a specialist clinical pharmacist with a background in digital marketing and business development. He works as a Clinical Copywriter at Numan, leveraging his research and writing abilities to shine a light on the health complications affecting men and women.

See full profile

Medically reviewed: